Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 10 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Oncology

Staging and Prognosis: Understanding the Path Forward

At a Glance

Bone sarcoma prognosis is primarily determined by whether the cancer has spread to the lungs or other bones. For patients receiving chemotherapy before surgery, the tumor necrosis rate (the percentage of cancer cells killed) is the most critical indicator of long-term treatment success.

Once your treatment is planned, staging and prognosis are the tools doctors use to answer two critical questions: “How advanced is the cancer?” and “What is the likely outcome?” For bone sarcoma, these answers are based on the tumor’s size, its “grade” (how aggressive the cells look), and—most importantly—whether it has spread to other parts of the body.

The Two Staging Systems

Because bone sarcomas are unique, doctors often use two different systems to describe them.

1. The Enneking (MSTS) System

This system is widely used by orthopedic surgeons because it focuses on how difficult the tumor will be to remove surgically [1]. It uses three factors:

  • Grade (G): Is it Low Grade (G1) or High Grade (G2)?
  • Site (T): Is the tumor intracompartmental (T1, contained within the bone/muscle) or extracompartmental (T2, has broken out into surrounding tissues)? [2]
  • Metastasis (M): Has it spread to other organs (M1)?
Stage Grade Site Spread
I (A/B) Low T1/T2 None
II (A/B) High T1/T2 None
III Any Any Spread to other organs

2. The AJCC (TNM) System

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system is more detailed and is used by medical oncologists to plan chemotherapy. It looks at:

  • Tumor Size: Is the tumor smaller or larger than 8 cm?
  • Nodes: Has it reached nearby lymph nodes?
  • Metastasis: Has it reached the lungs or other bones?

The Most Significant Factor: Spread

The presence of distant metastasis (cancer that has traveled away from the original site) is the single most important factor in determining prognosis [3].

  • Lungs: Bone sarcomas most commonly spread to the lungs. If the cancer is caught while it is still localized (only in the bone), survival rates are much higher [3].
  • Skip Lesions: Doctors also look for “skip lesions”—smaller tumors in the same bone but separate from the main mass. Their presence typically indicates a more aggressive disease.

The Huvos Grade: Measuring Success (Necrosis Rate)

For patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo before surgery), the most critical piece of prognostic information comes after the tumor is removed. A pathologist examines the tumor under a microscope to calculate the necrosis rate—the percentage of the tumor that was killed by the chemotherapy [4].

This is measured using the Huvos Grading System:

  • Grade I & II (Poor Response): Less than 90% of the tumor cells are dead [4][5].
  • Grade III & IV (Good Response): 90% to 100% of the tumor cells are dead [4][5].

A “Good Responder” (≥90% necrosis) generally has a significantly better long-term outlook [6][7]. If a patient is a “Poor Responder,” the medical team may discuss whether to adjust the chemotherapy drugs used after surgery to try a different approach [8].

Other Prognostic Clues

Beyond staging and necrosis, other factors help doctors understand the risk:

  • Location: Tumors in the extremities (arms/legs) often have a better prognosis than those in the axial skeleton (pelvis or spine), simply because they are easier to remove with clear margins [9].

  • Blood Markers: High levels of certain enzymes in the blood, such as ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase) or LDH (Lactate Dehydrogenase), can sometimes indicate a more active or aggressive tumor [10].

  • Tumor Size: Generally, tumors larger than 8 cm are considered higher risk than smaller ones.

  • Next: Learn about Survivorship and Beyond

Common questions in this guide

What is the difference between the Enneking and AJCC staging systems for bone sarcoma?
The Enneking (MSTS) system is used by orthopedic surgeons to plan surgery based on tumor grade, location, and spread. The AJCC system is used by medical oncologists to plan chemotherapy based on tumor size, lymph node involvement, and metastasis.
What does my tumor necrosis rate mean after chemotherapy?
The tumor necrosis rate, measured by the Huvos grading system, shows the percentage of cancer cells killed by chemotherapy before surgery. A higher necrosis rate, specifically 90 percent or more, typically indicates a much better long-term prognosis.
What are skip lesions in bone sarcoma?
Skip lesions are smaller cancerous tumors that form in the same bone but are completely separate from the main tumor mass. The presence of skip lesions usually indicates that the bone sarcoma is more aggressive.
What blood markers are monitored for bone sarcoma recurrence?
Doctors commonly monitor Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in your blood. Elevated levels of these specific enzymes can sometimes indicate a more active or aggressive tumor.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.What is my stage according to both the AJCC and the Enneking (MSTS) systems?
  2. 2.Is my tumor considered 'intracompartmental' or 'extracompartmental'?
  3. 3.(After surgery) What was the exact percentage of tumor necrosis in my pathology report?
  4. 4.Does my Huvos grade (necrosis rate) mean we should consider changing my chemotherapy plan?
  5. 5.What are the specific markers we will monitor to watch for the risk of recurrence?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (10)
  1. 1

    Diagnosis and staging of malignant bone tumours in children: what is due and what is new?

    Salom M, Chiari C, Alessandri JMG, et al.

    Journal of children's orthopaedics 2021; (15(4)):312-321 doi:10.1302/1863-2548.15.210107.

    PMID: 34476020
  2. 2

    Case report and literature review: Primary leiomyosarcoma of the bone in the trochanteric region of the femur.

    Wu Z, Cheng L, Cao Q, et al.

    Frontiers in surgery 2022; (9()):1045307 doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.1045307.

    PMID: 36704525
  3. 3

    The Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibitor Auranofin Suppresses Pulmonary Metastasis of Osteosarcoma, But Not Local Progression.

    Kinoshita H, Shimozato O, Ishii T, et al.

    Anticancer research 2021; (41(10)):4947-4955 doi:10.21873/anticanres.15308.

    PMID: 34593442
  4. 4

    Correlation between Prognostic Factors and the Histopathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma: A Retrospective Study.

    Prabowo Y, Setiawan I, Kamal AF, et al.

    International journal of surgical oncology 2021; (2021()):8843325 doi:10.1155/2021/8843325.

    PMID: 33996154
  5. 5

    Histopathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Enneking Stage II Conventional Osteosarcoma of Extremities: A Retrospective-Single Institution Study in Vietnam.

    Do KH, Nguyen TV, Hoang TT, et al.

    Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center 2024; (31()):10732748241274188 doi:10.1177/10732748241274188.

    PMID: 39183728
  6. 6

    Factors Affecting Prognosis and Survival in Extremity Osteosarcoma.

    Dharanikota A, Arjunan R, Dasappa A

    Indian journal of surgical oncology 2021; (12(1)):199-206 doi:10.1007/s13193-020-01277-2.

    PMID: 33814854
  7. 7

    Osteosarcoma: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.

    Friebele JC, Peck J, Pan X, et al.

    American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.) 2015; (44(12)):547-53.

    PMID: 26665241
  8. 8

    Determinants of tumor necrosis and its impact on outcome in patients with Localized osteosarcoma uniformly treated with a response adapted regimen without high dose Methotrexate- A retrospective institutional analysis.

    Roy PG, Ganguly S, Sasi A, et al.

    Journal of bone oncology 2024; (49()):100651 doi:10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100651.

    PMID: 39687212
  9. 9

    Survival analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based study.

    Song K, Song J, Lin K, et al.

    International orthopaedics 2019; (43(8)):1983-1991 doi:10.1007/s00264-019-04348-4.

    PMID: 31127366
  10. 10

    Predictive Factors for Lung Metastasis in High-Grade Osteosarcoma: A 5 Years Experience from Tertiary Referral Hospital.

    Prabowo Putro YA, Magetsari R, Oksikimbawan Tampubolon Y, et al.

    Acta orthopaedica Belgica 2024; (90(4)):739-743 doi:10.52628/90.4.12808.

    PMID: 39869878

This page explains bone sarcoma staging and prognostic systems for educational purposes only. Always consult your oncologist to discuss your specific staging, pathology report, and treatment outlook.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Bone sarcoma.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.