The Diagnostic Journey: Imaging Your Arteries
At a Glance
Carotid artery thrombosis is usually evaluated first with duplex ultrasound and, when blockage is suspected, confirmed with CT or MR angiography. These tests help distinguish a complete occlusion from a near-occlusion; catheter angiography is reserved for unclear cases or planned procedures.
The journey to a carotid diagnosis usually involves several different types of scans. Because no single test is perfect, your medical team often uses a “step-up” approach for stable outpatient evaluation—starting with a simple screening and moving to more detailed imaging to confirm the findings before deciding on a treatment plan [1][2]. (Note: Emergency pathways for acute stroke or suspected acute carotid occlusion differ; rapid brain and CTA/MRA imaging may be performed immediately without waiting for ultrasound).
Step 1: The Screening (Duplex Ultrasound)
For stable outpatient evaluation, a Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) is almost always the first test performed. It uses sound waves to create a picture of your artery and measure the speed of blood flow [3].
- Why it’s used first: It is non-invasive, does not use radiation or dyes, and is very effective at spotting significant narrowing [4].
- The Limitation: Ultrasound can be “operator-dependent,” meaning the results rely on the skill of the person performing the test. It can also be difficult to see through heavy calcium deposits, which create “shadows” on the image [2][5].
Step 2: The Confirmation (CTA or MRA)
If an ultrasound shows a serious blockage or complete occlusion, doctors typically order a second, more detailed scan to confirm the result [1]. This is usually a CT Angiogram (CTA) or an MR Angiogram (MRA).
- CTA: Uses a specialized CT scan and an iodinated contrast dye to map the arteries from your heart all the way into your brain [6]. It is excellent for seeing the “anatomy” of the blockage but does involve radiation [3].
- MRA: Uses magnetic fields to visualize blood flow. It may be noncontrast or use gadolinium. The radiology team selects the test based on kidney function, prior contrast reactions, implants, and clinical urgency [7]. A prior reaction to iodinated contrast does not automatically make all CTA impossible, and many modern pacemakers are MRI compatible if checked.
The “String Sign” and Pseudo-Occlusion
One of the most critical reasons for a second scan is to distinguish between a true occlusion and a pseudo-occlusion (also called near-occlusion) [8].
- True Occlusion: The artery is 100% blocked, and no blood is moving through it [9].
- Pseudo-Occlusion: Near-occlusion is a severe stenosis with markedly reduced distal internal-carotid caliber or flow—sometimes producing an angiographic appearance called a string sign [10].
On a standard ultrasound, these two can look identical because the flow in a pseudo-occlusion is so slow it may not be detected [11]. This distinction is vital. However, revascularization for near-occlusion is highly individualized—especially when distal vessel collapse is present—and is not automatically beneficial compared to medical therapy. Specialist review of the CTA/MRA is required [8][12].
Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA)
A Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is an invasive procedure where a catheter is threaded through an artery (usually in the groin or wrist) up to the neck [13].
While CTA and MRA have replaced DSA for most patients, it is reserved for situations in which noninvasive imaging is inadequate or as part of a planned intervention [6]. Your doctor may recommend a DSA if:
- Your ultrasound and CTA results contradict each other [14].
- The anatomy is too complex to see on standard scans [15].
- You are already undergoing a procedure, like a stent placement, where the doctor needs real-time “live” images [16].
Be aware that DSA carries small but important risks, including bleeding, contrast reaction or kidney injury, and a small risk of embolic stroke.
Your Imaging Report: A Completeness Checklist
When you receive your imaging report, look for these specific details to discuss with your doctor:
- Laterality: Does it clearly state which side is affected (Left vs. Right)? [17]
- Degree of Stenosis: Is the narrowing listed as a specific percentage or category (e.g., 70-99%)? Percentages are often reported using the NASCET method [4].
- The “String Sign” Check: Does the report explicitly mention if it’s a total occlusion or if there is a “threadlike” flow (near-occlusion)? [8]
- Plaque Features: Does it mention “ulceration” (pits in the plaque) or “mobile thrombus” (a loose clot), which can increase stroke risk? [18]
- Intracranial & Collateral Check (If clinically relevant): Did the specialized scans look at the vessels inside the brain to check for “tandem” blockages or collateral flow? [19][20]
Common questions in this guide
What imaging test is usually done first for suspected carotid artery blockage?
Why might I need a CTA or MRA after a carotid ultrasound?
What is a carotid near-occlusion or string sign?
Can an ultrasound mistake a near-occlusion for a total blockage?
What should I look for in my carotid imaging report?
When is a catheter angiogram or DSA needed?
Can I have an MRA if I have a pacemaker or a contrast reaction?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Does my ultrasound report suggest a complete blockage (occlusion) or 'near-occlusion' with a threadlike flow?
- 2.If my ultrasound says 'occlusion,' can we confirm this with a CTA or MRA to make sure it isn't a 'pseudo-occlusion'?
- 3.What specific velocity criteria did the ultrasound lab use to determine my percentage of narrowing?
- 4.Do I have any 'acoustic shadowing' from calcium that might be making my ultrasound results less accurate?
- 5.Based on my imaging, is there any evidence of a 'tandem' blockage further up inside my brain?
- 6.Is a catheter-based angiogram (DSA) necessary for me, or can we make a treatment plan based on my non-invasive scans?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (20)
- 1
Derivation of a clinical prediction score for the diagnosis of clinically significant symptomatic carotid artery disease.
Abdulaziz KE, Taljaard M, Dowlatshahi D, et al.
CJEM 2024; (26(10)):741-750 doi:10.1007/s43678-024-00759-4.
PMID: 39190092 - 2
Symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease: Revascularization.
Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, Roffi M
Progress in cardiovascular diseases 2017; (59(6)):601-611 doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2017.04.002.
PMID: 28442330 - 3
Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.
Cassola N, Baptista-Silva JC, Nakano LC, et al.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2022; (7()):CD013172 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2.
PMID: 35815652 - 4
Why are we still debating criteria for carotid artery stenosis?
Del Brutto VJ, Gornik HL, Rundek T
Annals of translational medicine 2020; (8(19)):1270 doi:10.21037/atm-20-1188a.
PMID: 33178802 - 5
Ultrasonography Grading of Internal Carotid Artery Disease: Multiparametric German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) versus Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) Consensus Criteria.
Winzer S, Rickmann H, Kitzler H, et al.
Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980) 2022; (43(6)):608-613 doi:10.1055/a-1487-5941.
PMID: 33951737 - 6
Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis.
Adla T, Adlova R
The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc 2015; (24(3)):179-84 doi:10.1055/s-0035-1556056.
PMID: 26417185 - 7
Comparison of Carotid Doppler Ultrasound to Other Angiographic Modalities in the Measurement of Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Boyko M, Kalashyan H, Becher H, et al.
Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging 2018; (28(6)):683-687 doi:10.1111/jon.12532.
PMID: 29917285 - 8
The pitfalls and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with carotid near-occlusion: a narrative review.
Xia F, Zhao J, Bao L, Lyu X
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 2024; (14(12)):9600-9619 doi:10.21037/qims-24-1037.
PMID: 39698665 - 9
Chronic total occlusion and spontaneous recanalization of the internal carotid artery: Natural history and management strategy.
Lall A, Yavagal DR, Bornak A
Vascular 2021; (29(5)):733-741 doi:10.1177/1708538120978043.
PMID: 33297876 - 10
Duplex ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging in carotid artery occlusion diagnosis.
Speranza G, Harish K, Rockman C, et al.
Journal of vascular surgery 2024; (79(3)):577-583 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.029.
PMID: 37992947 - 11
Time-Resolved 4-Dimensional Computed-Tomography Angiography Can Correctly Identify Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion.
Ng FC, Datta M, Choi PM
Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association 2016; (25(4)):1005-6.
PMID: 26907678 - 12
Endarterectomy, Stenting, or Medical Treatment for Symptomatic Carotid Near-Occlusion: Results from CAOS, a Multicenter Registry Study.
Garcia-Pastor A, Gil-Núñez A, Ramirez-Moreno JM, et al.
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2022; (43(9)):1304-1310 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7617.
PMID: 35981762 - 13
Importance of cerebral angiography in the evaluation of delayed carotid stent thrombosis: a case report.
Masoud Z, Daza-Ovalle JF, Esenwa C
Journal of medical case reports 2024; (18(1)):109 doi:10.1186/s13256-024-04379-5.
PMID: 38383477 - 14
Carotid Stenosis: Utility of Diagnostic Angiography.
Felbaum DR, Maxwell C, Naydin S, et al.
World neurosurgery 2019; (121()):e962-e966 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.054.
PMID: 30336298 - 15
Effect of anterior communicating artery patency on the flow velocity in bilateral carotid artery stenosis after carotid endarterectomy.
Xia M, Hua Y, Jia L, et al.
Vascular medicine (London, England) 2023; (28(4)):308-314 doi:10.1177/1358863X231171611.
PMID: 37249031 - 16
Four collateral circulation pathways were observed after common carotid artery occlusion.
Wang J, Zheng C, Hou B, et al.
BMC neurology 2019; (19(1)):201 doi:10.1186/s12883-019-1425-0.
PMID: 31429719 - 17
Prevalence and risk factors of symptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with recent transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke in the Netherlands.
den Brok MG, Kuhrij LS, Roozenbeek B, et al.
European stroke journal 2020; (5(3)):271-277 doi:10.1177/2396987320932065.
PMID: 33072881 - 18
Sonographic features associated with ischemic stroke in patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection: a single-center exploratory study.
Xu X, Zhang L, Ji Y, Hui P
BMC medical imaging 2026; (26(1)).
PMID: 41862839 - 19
Tandem Carotid Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Challenges, and Future Directions.
Poppe AY, Jacquin G, Roy D, et al.
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2020; (41(7)):1142-1148 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6582.
PMID: 32499251 - 20
The Value of Non-Invasive Optimal Vessel Analysis Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Studying Flow and Collateral Patterns in Patients with Bilateral Carotid Steno-Occlusive Disease.
Helg F, Colombo E, Inauen C, et al.
Brain sciences 2025; (15(2)) doi:10.3390/brainsci15020211.
PMID: 40002542
This page explains carotid artery imaging for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your clinician and radiology team should interpret your results and recommend the safest next step for you.
Get notified when new evidence is published on carotid artery thrombosis.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.