Predicting Your Progress: Understanding CML Risk Scores
At a Glance
CML risk scores, like the modern ELTS score and historical Sokal score, use your age, spleen size, and blood counts at diagnosis to predict how aggressive your leukemia is. This score helps your oncologist decide whether to start you on a first- or second-generation TKI therapy.
When you are first diagnosed with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), your doctor will perform a process called risk stratification. This is essentially a way of calculating how aggressive your leukemia is likely to be and how well it might respond to different treatments.
Doctors use mathematical models called risk scores to group patients into low, intermediate, or high-risk categories. Understanding these scores helps you and your care team decide which Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) is the best starting point for you [1][2].
The Evolution of Risk Scores
There are two primary scores used in CML care today: the Sokal Score and the ELTS (EUTOS Long-Term Survival) Score.
- The Sokal Score (The Historical Tool): Developed in the early 1980s, the Sokal score was created before modern TKIs existed. It was designed to predict how long patients would live in the era of traditional chemotherapy [1][3]. While it is still frequently used, it has a tendency to categorize more people as “high risk” than may actually be the case today [1][4].
- The ELTS Score (The Modern Tool): The ELTS score was specifically developed to work in the era of TKI treatment. It is now recommended by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) as the preferred tool because it is better at predicting CML-related mortality—specifically, the risk of dying from the leukemia itself rather than other causes [1][5][6].
How the Scores are Calculated
Both scores use a combination of your clinical and laboratory data at the time of diagnosis. They both look at:
- Age: Older age can sometimes be associated with different risks [1].
- Spleen Size: Measured by how far the spleen extends below the ribs [1].
- Platelet Count: The number of clotting cells in your blood [1].
- Blast Percentage: The amount of immature white blood cells in your blood or bone marrow [1].
Why the ELTS Score is Superior
The ELTS score is considered more accurate for today’s patients because it recognizes that with TKI therapy, many patients will live long enough to eventually pass away from natural causes or other health conditions (like heart disease) rather than the leukemia itself [1][3]. By focusing on “CML-related death,” it provides a clearer picture of how the cancer is actually behaving [7][3].
How Risk Scores Influence Treatment
Your risk score is a key factor in choosing your first medication. See Targeted Therapy for more on treatment options.
- Low Risk: For many low-risk patients, first-generation TKIs like imatinib are an excellent choice. They are highly effective and often have fewer long-term side effects [8].
- High Risk: Patients categorized as high-risk by the ELTS score often benefit from starting on more potent second-generation TKIs (like dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib). These drugs can drive the leukemia levels down faster and more deeply, which is critical for preventing the disease from progressing [7][9].
While a high-risk score may lean a doctor toward a second-generation TKI, the decision is never based on the score alone. Your doctor will also consider your overall health, such as heart or lung conditions, and your personal treatment goals [10][11]. For example, if you have certain cardiovascular issues, your doctor might choose imatinib even if your risk score is high, as some second-generation drugs can carry higher heart-related risks [12].
Common questions in this guide
What is the ELTS score for CML?
How is my CML risk score calculated?
What is the difference between the Sokal and ELTS scores?
Will a high risk score change my CML treatment?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.What is my risk score on the ELTS (EUTOS Long-Term Survival) scale, and how does that influence your choice of TKI for me?
- 2.Given that the Sokal score was developed before modern drugs like imatinib, why might you still use it alongside the ELTS score?
- 3.Does my risk level mean I should start with a second-generation TKI (like dasatinib or nilotinib) rather than imatinib?
- 4.What is the 'leukemia-specific' survival probability for someone in my risk group?
- 5.How do my other health factors, like heart or lung health, weigh against my risk score when choosing my treatment?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (12)
- 1
The EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score is superior to the Sokal score for predicting survival in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Pfirrmann M, Clark RE, Prejzner W, et al.
Leukemia 2020; (34(8)):2138-2149 doi:10.1038/s41375-020-0931-9.
PMID: 32601376 - 2
Measuring prognosis in chronic myeloid leukemia: what's new?
Breccia M, Efficace F, Scalzulli E, et al.
Expert review of hematology 2021; (14(6)):577-585 doi:10.1080/17474086.2021.1938534.
PMID: 34075852 - 3
Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Multicentric Cohort Study by the Italian CML GIMEMA Network.
Specchia G, Pregno P, Breccia M, et al.
Frontiers in oncology 2021; (11()):739171 doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.739171.
PMID: 34513714 - 4
Long-term outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Guilhot F, Hehlmann R
Blood 2025; (145(9)):910-920 doi:10.1182/blood.2024026311.
PMID: 39486043 - 5
European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia.
Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, et al.
Leukemia 2020; (34(4)):966-984 doi:10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2.
PMID: 32127639 - 6
[Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in China (2025)].
Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi 2025; (46(12)):1081-1093 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20250923-00437.
PMID: 41486652 - 7
The EUTOS long-term survival score predicts disease-specific mortality and molecular responses among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in a practice-based cohort.
Sato E, Iriyama N, Tokuhira M, et al.
Cancer medicine 2020; (9(23)):8931-8939 doi:10.1002/cam4.3516.
PMID: 33037866 - 8
Asciminib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Hochhaus A, Wang J, Kim DW, et al.
The New England journal of medicine 2024; (391(10)):885-898 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2400858.
PMID: 38820078 - 9
Changes in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment modalities and outcomes after introduction of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy: a multi-institutional retrospective study by the CML Cooperative Study Group.
Iriyama N, Iwanaga E, Kimura Y, et al.
International journal of hematology 2024; (120(1)):60-70 doi:10.1007/s12185-024-03758-4.
PMID: 38587692 - 10
Turkey real-life data: demographic features, treatment results and effects of comorbidities in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Saydam G, Unal A, Haznedaroglu IC, et al.
International journal of hematologic oncology 2022; (11(3)):IJH40 doi:10.2217/ijh-2021-0008.
PMID: 36101779 - 11
Phase 2 study of bosutinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Hino M, Matsumura I, Fujisawa S, et al.
International journal of hematology 2020; (112(1)):24-32 doi:10.1007/s12185-020-02878-x.
PMID: 32279228 - 12
Ponatinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and increased cardiovascular risk: A review of management strategies.
Sacha T, Krawczyk K
Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy 2025; (47(1)):103675 doi:10.1016/j.htct.2024.04.124.
PMID: 39448326
This page explains CML risk scores for educational purposes only. Always consult your hematologist or oncologist to understand your specific risk category and what it means for your treatment plan.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Chronic myeloid leukemia.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.