The Diagnostic Journey: Proving and Locating a Gastrinoma
At a Glance
Pancreatic gastrinoma is confirmed by combining fasting gastrin with gastric pH; secretin testing can help when results are unclear. DOTATATE PET/CT and endoscopic ultrasound help locate small tumors, while Ki-67 and mitotic count show how quickly the tumor may grow.
Confirming a diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES) requires more than a single blood test. Because high levels of the hormone gastrin can be caused by many different things—including the very medications used to treat reflux—doctors must follow a specific sequence of tests to prove a tumor is responsible [1][2].
The First Step: Gastrin and Acid
The diagnostic process usually begins with two tests performed at the same time:
- Fasting Serum Gastrin (FSG): A blood test to measure how much gastrin your body is producing [3].
- Gastric pH: A test to measure how much acid is actually in your stomach [1].
The Diagnostic Threshold: A gastrin level above 1,000 pg/mL combined with a gastric pH of less than 2.0 is considered diagnostic for ZES when measured under appropriate conditions [1][2]. However, testing must be interpreted carefully. If your gastrin is high but your stomach is not acidic (pH above 4.0), it does not automatically rule out ZES if you are taking a PPI; it simply means the medication is working. If you are off medications, high gastrin with a pH above 4.0 means your body might be making gastrin to compensate for a lack of acid, a condition called atrophic gastritis [2][4]. Kidney insufficiency and H. pylori can also raise gastrin.
The Secretin Stimulation Test
If your gastrin is elevated but hasn’t reached the 1,000 pg/mL mark, or if your acid levels are borderline, your doctor may order a secretin stimulation test [1].
- How it works: Secretin is a hormone that normally stops gastrin production in healthy cells. However, in gastrinoma tumor cells, secretin actually triggers a massive release of gastrin [5].
- The Result: If your gastrin levels rise significantly (often defined as an assay-dependent jump of more than 120 pg/mL or 200 pg/mL) after receiving secretin, it strongly points to a gastrinoma [6][5].
The Dangers of Stopping PPIs
To get accurate results, patients were historically told to stop taking Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) like omeprazole for at least one week before testing [1]. Warning: Do not stop these medications on your own. Abruptly stopping PPIs in a patient with an undiagnosed gastrinoma can cause a “rebound” of massive acid production, leading to emergency ulcers or perforation [1][7]. Some recent research suggests that the secretin test can be performed safely while still on PPIs, but this must be managed by a specialist [8].
Imaging: Finding the “Hidden” Tumor
Once the bloodwork confirms ZES, the next challenge is finding the tumor, which can be as small as a pea [9].
- DOTATATE PET/CT: This is the most sensitive scan available. It uses a radioactive tracer that sticks to somatostatin receptors on the surface of neuroendocrine tumors [10].
- The “Pancreas Head” Trap: A common pitfall of this scan is that the head of the pancreas often shows “physiologic uptake”—meaning it naturally glows on the scan even when no tumor is present [10][11]. Radiologists must carefully compare this with a CT or MRI to see if there is an actual physical lump [12].
- Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS): A tiny ultrasound probe is passed down your throat to look at the pancreas and duodenum from the inside, which is excellent for finding very small tumors that other scans miss [13].
Reading Your Pathology Report
If a piece of the tumor is removed or biopsied, a pathologist will assign it a WHO Grade based on its differentiation, its Ki-67 index, and its mitotic count [14]. The Ki-67 index measures what percentage of the tumor cells are currently dividing (growing) [15]. A small biopsy can sometimes under-sample a faster-growing “hotspot.”
| WHO Grade | Ki-67 Index | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Well-Differentiated Grade 1 (G1) | Less than 3% | Very slow-growing [16]. |
| Well-Differentiated Grade 2 (G2) | 3% to 20% | Moderately slow-growing [16]. |
| Well-Differentiated Grade 3 (G3) | Greater than 20% | Faster-growing, but still well-differentiated; distinct from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) [16]. |
Knowing your grade helps your doctor predict how the tumor will behave over time and determine how often you need follow-up scans [17].
Common questions in this guide
How is a pancreatic gastrinoma diagnosed?
What happens during a secretin stimulation test for gastrinoma?
Can I stop my PPI before gastrinoma testing?
Which scans can find a small pancreatic gastrinoma?
Does activity in the head of the pancreas on a DOTATATE scan always mean a tumor?
What do Ki-67 and mitotic count mean on a gastrinoma pathology report?
Can something other than a gastrinoma cause a high gastrin level?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.What was my fasting gastrin level, and how did it compare to the 'upper limit of normal' for the lab that ran it?
- 2.During my gastric pH test, was the acid level below 2.0 while I was off my medications?
- 3.If we do a secretin stimulation test, can we perform it safely while I stay on a low dose of my PPI to avoid a dangerous acid rebound?
- 4.On my DOTATATE PET scan, is the activity in the pancreas head a distinct tumor or could it be 'physiologic uptake' (normal background activity)?
- 5.What is the Ki-67 percentage and mitotic count on my pathology report?
- 6.How many cells were counted to determine my Ki-67 rate, and was it done in a 'hotspot' area of the tumor?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (17)
- 1
All you need to know about gastrinoma today | Gastrinoma and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: A thorough update.
Chatzipanagiotou O, Schizas D, Vailas M, et al.
Journal of neuroendocrinology 2023; (35(4)):e13267 doi:10.1111/jne.13267.
PMID: 37042078 - 2
Gastric Hypersecretory States: Investigation and Management.
Phan J, Benhammou JN, Pisegna JR
Current treatment options in gastroenterology 2015; (13(4)):386-97 doi:10.1007/s11938-015-0065-8.
PMID: 26342486 - 3
Gastrinoma and Zollinger Ellison syndrome: A roadmap for the management between new and old therapies.
Rossi RE, Elvevi A, Citterio D, et al.
World journal of gastroenterology 2021; (27(35)):5890-5907 doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i35.5890.
PMID: 34629807 - 4
Diarrhea, Weight Loss, and an Elevated Gastrin: A Case Report.
Alexander RG, Cheville JC, Thompson GB, Alexander GL
Case reports in gastroenterology 2025; (19(1)):428-433 doi:10.1159/000545714.
PMID: 40503451 - 5
Catching the Zebra: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls for the Successful Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.
Mendelson AH, Donowitz M
Digestive diseases and sciences 2017; (62(9)):2258-2265 doi:10.1007/s10620-017-4695-7.
PMID: 28776139 - 6
Secretin Stimulation Test and Early Diagnosis of Gastrinoma in MEN1 Syndrome: Survey on the MEN1 Florentine Database.
Giusti F, Cioppi F, Fossi C, et al.
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2022; (107(5)):e2110-e2123 doi:10.1210/clinem/dgab903.
PMID: 34922358 - 7
Assessing for Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 in Patients Evaluated for Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome-Clues to a Safer Diagnostic Process.
Singh Ospina N, Donegan D, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, et al.
The American journal of medicine 2017; (130(5)):603-605 doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.11.035.
PMID: 28011308 - 8
Validity of Secretin Stimulation Testing on Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.
Bhattacharya S, Blau JE, Cochran C, et al.
The American journal of gastroenterology 2021; (116(11)):2216-2221 doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001487.
PMID: 34515664 - 9
[Comparison of clinical characteristics between sporadic gastrinoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related gastrinoma].
Guo Y, Chen LH, Liu M, et al.
Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2021; (24(10)):875-882 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20210719-00291.
PMID: 34674462 - 10
Somatostatin receptor imaging with 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT: clinical utility, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls in interpretation.
Hofman MS, Lau WF, Hicks RJ
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 2015; (35(2)):500-16 doi:10.1148/rg.352140164.
PMID: 25763733 - 11
Current Concepts in 68Ga-DOTATATE Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Interpretation, Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Molecular Strategies.
Bodei L, Ambrosini V, Herrmann K, Modlin I
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 2017; (58(11)):1718-1726 doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.186361.
PMID: 28818983 - 12
Autoimmune Pancreatitis Mimicking a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report with a Literature Review.
Franchina M, Dell'Oro L, Massironi S
International journal of molecular sciences 2025; (26(4)) doi:10.3390/ijms26041536.
PMID: 40004001 - 13
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided side-fenestrated needle biopsy sampling is sensitive for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors but inadequate for tumor grading: a prospective study.
Appelstrand A, Bergstedt F, Elf AK, et al.
Scientific reports 2022; (12(1)):5971 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09923-1.
PMID: 35396490 - 14
Digital image analysis of Ki67 hotspot detection and index counting in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Saetiew K, Angkathunyakul N, Hunnangkul S, Pongpaibul A
Annals of diagnostic pathology 2024; (71()):152295 doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152295.
PMID: 38547761 - 15
Comparison of Three Ki-67 Index Quantification Methods and Clinical Significance in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Kroneman TN, Voss JS, Lohse CM, et al.
Endocrine pathology 2015; (26(3)):255-62 doi:10.1007/s12022-015-9379-2.
PMID: 26072124 - 16
Surgery in Patients with Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, Neuroendocrine Tumors G3 and High Grade Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Holmager P, Langer SW, Kjaer A, et al.
Current treatment options in oncology 2022; (23(6)):806-817 doi:10.1007/s11864-022-00969-x.
PMID: 35362798 - 17
Grading Using Ki-67 Index and Mitotic Rate Increases the Prognostic Accuracy of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Philips P, Kooby DA, Maithel S, et al.
Pancreas 2018; (47(3)):326-331 doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000990.
PMID: 29351120
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice about a suspected pancreatic gastrinoma. Do not change or stop a PPI or other acid-suppressing medicine without guidance from your healthcare team.
Get notified when new evidence is published on pancreatic gastrinoma.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.