Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 17 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Otolaryngology · Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma

Scans and Reports: Auditing Your Diagnosis

At a Glance

Sinonasal inverted papilloma is evaluated by combining CT, MRI, biopsy, and final surgical pathology rather than relying on one test. CT maps bone and possible attachment, MRI maps soft tissue, and pathology checks the subtype, precancerous changes, margins, and invasive cancer.

Navigating the diagnosis of a sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) requires looking at multiple pieces of a puzzle. No single test tells the whole story; instead, your care team uses a combination of advanced imaging and tissue analysis to map out the tumor and plan for its complete removal.

The Power of Two: Why You Might Need CT and MRI

Depending on the size, location, and surgical planning for your tumor, you may undergo both a Computed Tomography (CT) scan and a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan. While they both look at your sinuses, they provide very different information:

  • CT Scan (The Bone Map): CT is the gold standard for looking at your facial bones. It can show bone remodeling or erosion caused by the tumor’s growth [1][2]. Most importantly, it looks for focal hyperostosis—a localized thickening of the bone that can suggest the tumor’s root or attachment site, though it is not absolute proof [3].
  • MRI Scan (The Soft-Tissue Map): MRI is superior for looking at the tumor itself and distinguishing it from normal mucus or inflammation [4]. Specialists look for a unique “brain-like” appearance called a convoluted cerebriform pattern (CCP), which is highly characteristic of an inverted papilloma [5]. If this pattern is lost or looks “messy,” it can be a clue for aggressive growth, though benign inflammation, hemorrhage, or technical factors can also affect this appearance [6].

Decoding Your Pathology Report

A biopsy is a small sample of tissue taken to be examined under a microscope. However, a single biopsy from a doctor’s office can be tricky. It may only catch a nearby “inflammatory polyp” instead of the tumor itself, leading to a false negative [7]. If your scans show a tumor but your biopsy is negative, your doctor may need to take another sample or wait to examine the full tumor after surgery [8].

When you receive your final pathology report after surgery, it is helpful to review it alongside the surgeon’s operative report. Ensure they cover these key details:

  1. Subtype: It should confirm if the tumor is inverted, exophytic, or oncocytic [9].
  2. Dysplasia and Carcinoma in Situ: The report checks for dysplasia, which describes abnormal, potentially preinvasive cells. Carcinoma in situ (CIS) is a non-invasive cancer, not simply a grade of dysplasia [10]. Both findings are particularly relevant to the tumor’s malignant potential [11].
  3. Presence of Cancer: The report must state whether any invasive squamous cell carcinoma was found within the papilloma [12].
  4. Margins and Attachment: While the pathology report examines the tissue margins when meaningful, the exact attachment site is often best determined by the surgeon’s operative report and imaging, rather than pathology alone [13].

Staging Systems: Extent vs. Origin

In most cancers, “staging” is about how far a tumor has spread. For inverted papillomas, specialists use classification systems to plan surgery. The Krouse staging system is an extent-based classification commonly used to describe how many sinuses are involved [14].

Some specialists use origin-based classification (like the Meng system), which focuses on exactly where the tumor is attached [15]. This is because incomplete removal of the attachment site is a major driver of recurrence. Centers use several systems, and no single staging system reliably predicts recurrence for every patient; what matters most is identifying the attachment site to treat the underlying bone [16][17].

Common questions in this guide

Why might I need both a CT scan and an MRI for inverted papilloma?
CT is best for showing the facial bones, including remodeling, erosion, and focal hyperostosis that may point to the tumor’s attachment. MRI shows the soft-tissue tumor and can help distinguish it from mucus or inflammation, including by its characteristic folded, brain-like pattern. Your team may use one or both depending on the tumor’s size, location, and surgical planning.
What does focal hyperostosis on a CT scan mean?
Focal hyperostosis is a small area of thickened bone on CT. It can suggest where an inverted papilloma is attached, but it is not definitive by itself. The surgeon compares the scan findings with the operative findings to identify and remove the attachment site.
Can a biopsy be negative even if my scan shows inverted papilloma?
Yes. An office biopsy may sample an inflammatory polyp next to the tumor rather than the tumor itself, producing a false-negative result. If imaging still shows a suspicious mass, your doctor may recommend another sample or examine the entire tumor after surgery.
What does a convoluted cerebriform pattern mean on an MRI?
A convoluted cerebriform pattern is a folded, brain-like appearance on MRI that is strongly characteristic of inverted papilloma. If the pattern is lost or becomes disorganized, it can raise concern for more aggressive growth, but inflammation, bleeding, or technical issues can cause similar changes. It does not by itself prove cancer.
What should be included in my final inverted papilloma pathology report?
The final report should identify the papilloma subtype, such as inverted, exophytic, or oncocytic, and state whether dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, or invasive squamous cell carcinoma is present. It may also describe margins when they can be meaningfully assessed. The exact attachment site is often better determined from the operative report and imaging than from pathology alone.
How are Krouse and Meng classifications used for inverted papilloma?
Krouse classification describes how extensively the tumor involves the sinuses, while origin-based systems such as Meng focus on where it is attached. These systems help surgeons plan the operation rather than acting like cancer staging. No single system reliably predicts recurrence for every patient, so identifying and removing the attachment site is especially important.

Get notified when new evidence is published on inverted papilloma.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (17)
  1. 1

    Radial intralesional linear calcifications and focal hyperostosis: key points for diagnosis, extension and point of origin identification of sinonasal inverted papilloma.

    Granell E, Cardesin A, Pallares D, et al.

    Rhinology 2025; (63(2)):250-252 doi:10.4193/Rhin24.379.

    PMID: 39968850
  2. 2

    A multimodal diagnostic approach to inverted papilloma: Proposal of a novel diagnostic flow-chart.

    Russo C, Elefante A, Romano A, et al.

    Current problems in diagnostic radiology 2021; (50(4)):499-504 doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.04.009.

    PMID: 32540138
  3. 3

    Can Computed Tomography Findings Predict the Recurrence of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma?

    Glikson E, Dragonetti A, Soudry E, et al.

    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2021; (164(5)):1116-1121 doi:10.1177/0194599820964798.

    PMID: 33048600
  4. 4

    Prediction of the originating site of sinonasal inverted papilloma by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

    Fang G, Lou H, Yu W, et al.

    International forum of allergy & rhinology 2016; (6(12)):1221-1228 doi:10.1002/alr.21836.

    PMID: 27557563
  5. 5

    Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Showing a Misleading Finding on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

    Numano Y, Nomura K, Sugawara M, et al.

    Ear, nose, & throat journal 2025; (104(2)):NP59-NP62 doi:10.1177/01455613221095614.

    PMID: 35485578
  6. 6

    Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising from Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma.

    Ginat DT, Trzcinska A, Horowitz P

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2020; (41(7)):1156-1159 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6583.

    PMID: 32467185
  7. 7

    Challenging Nasal Pathologies: An Inverted Nasal Papilloma Case Series Illustrating Diagnostic Challenges and Management Strategies.

    Buali HF, Alrayyes H, Habib H, Ansari S

    Cureus 2024; (16(8)):e66577 doi:10.7759/cureus.66577.

    PMID: 39252714
  8. 8

    Keeping in Mind Its Synchronous Features, Is Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Always Benign?

    Sultan Abdul Kader MI, Prahaspathiji UJ, Ahmad AR, Zahedi FD

    Cureus 2022; (14(7)):e27498 doi:10.7759/cureus.27498.

    PMID: 36060361
  9. 9

    Endoscopic Modified Danker's Approach for Management of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma: Our Experience.

    Baser B, Mishra A, Chaubey P

    Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021; (73(3)):282-289 doi:10.1007/s12070-020-02090-7.

    PMID: 34471615
  10. 10

    Clinical Implications of Carcinoma In Situ in Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma.

    Maina IW, Tong CCL, Baranov E, et al.

    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2019; (161(6)):1036-1042 doi:10.1177/0194599819883298.

    PMID: 31635524
  11. 11

    Impact of Dysplasia on Inverted Papilloma Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Giannaris P, Tham T, Giannaris E, et al.

    International forum of allergy & rhinology 2026; (16(8)):841-851 doi:10.1002/alr.70215.

    PMID: 42383302
  12. 12

    Malignant Transformation of Sinonasal Papilloma: Assessment of Clinicopathologic Features, p16 and p53 Expression, Transcriptionally Active HPV Status and Underlying Molecular Alterations.

    Amin SE, Sono R, Al-Jumaili ZI, et al.

    Head and neck pathology 2026; (20(1)).

    PMID: 42008207
  13. 13

    Attachment-oriented endoscopic surgical management for inverted papillomas in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.

    Makihara S, Kariya S, Naito T, et al.

    Auris, nasus, larynx 2019; (46(5)):748-753 doi:10.1016/j.anl.2019.02.007.

    PMID: 30833129
  14. 14

    Association of Krouse Classification for Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma With Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Lisan Q, Moya-Plana A, Bonfils P

    JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery 2017; (143(11)):1104-1110 doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1686.

    PMID: 28973390
  15. 15

    Comparison of Current Staging Systems for Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma.

    Nakayama T, Tsunemi Y, Kashiwagi T, et al.

    American journal of rhinology & allergy 2021; (35(1)):64-71 doi:10.1177/1945892420933178.

    PMID: 32586102
  16. 16

    A Systematic Review of Definitive Treatment for Inverted Papilloma Attachment Site and Associations With Recurrence.

    Trent MS, Goshtasbi K, Hui L, et al.

    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2022; (167(3)):425-433 doi:10.1177/01945998211051975.

    PMID: 34637363
  17. 17

    Endoscopic Modified Medial Maxillectomy for Inverted Papilloma of the Maxillary Sinus.

    Liu Q, Weng C, Zheng H, et al.

    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2022; (33(1)):e71-e73 doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007989.

    PMID: 34261968

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your ENT surgeon, radiologist, and pathologist should interpret your CT, MRI, biopsy, and pathology findings and guide decisions about your care.