Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 15 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Endocrinology · Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide–Secreting Tumor (VIPoma)

Labs, Scans, and Your Pathology Report

At a Glance

A VIPoma diagnosis is not based on one test: doctors combine a properly handled VIP blood level, tests showing secretory diarrhea, tumor scans, and pathology results that describe the tumor’s type, grade, and spread.

Confirming a VIPoma diagnosis requires more than a single blood test. Because this condition is so rare, doctors use a combination of specialized lab work, high-tech “functional” scans, and detailed tissue analysis to build a complete picture of the tumor and the hormonal crisis it causes [1][2].

Laboratory Testing: Blood and Stool

The first step is usually measuring the amount of Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) in your blood. However, interpreting these results is complex.

  • The VIP Blood Test: A markedly elevated VIP level in a patient with documented high-volume secretory diarrhea strongly supports the diagnosis. The laboratory’s reference range and clinical context matter significantly [3].
  • Sample Handling and Accuracy: VIP is a fragile hormone. If the blood sample is not chilled, separated, and frozen quickly, it can degrade, risking a falsely low or unreliable result [4]. Conversely, mild elevations can sometimes be nonspecific or caused by “assay interference” [3][5]. Discordant results may require repeat testing with proper handling and specialist review.
  • Stool Osmotic Gap: To help confirm the mechanism of your diarrhea, doctors may test a stool sample. A stool osmotic gap that is very low supports the presence of secretory diarrhea [2][6]. While this is a helpful clue, it does not confirm VIPoma specifically, as infections and other medications can also cause secretory diarrhea.

Advanced Imaging: Mapping the Tumor

While standard scans like CT and MRI are used to see the size and location of the tumor, they only tell part of the story.

  • Anatomic Imaging (CT/MRI): These scans provide a detailed map of the pancreas and look for spread to the liver [7]. MRI is often better at spotting very small tumors or liver metastases that a CT might miss [8].
  • Functional Imaging (Ga-68 or Cu-64 DOTATATE PET/CT): This is a specialized scan designed for neuroendocrine tumors [9]. A radioactive tracer (DOTATATE) is injected that “sticks” to somatostatin receptors on the surface of most VIPoma cells [9]. This scan is highly valuable because it:
    • Finds small clusters of tumor cells that might be less visible on standard CT scans [9].
    • Assesses somatostatin-receptor expression, which is an important (though not the sole) factor in determining if therapies like PRRT might be appropriate [10].

Auditing Your Pathology Report

If you have a biopsy or surgery, a pathologist will examine the tumor cells under a microscope. This report is interpreted together with biochemical results and imaging [11]. You should look for specific terms:

  1. Differentiation: Most VIPomas are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, meaning the cells still look somewhat like healthy cells [11]. This is a very different disease from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, because the treatments differ completely [12].
  2. Ki-67 Index & Mitotic Rate: The Ki-67 is a percentage that tells you how many tumor cells are actively dividing. The mitotic rate is another measure of cell division [11].
  3. Tumor Grade: Pathologists use the Ki-67 and the mitotic rate to assign a grade:
    • Grade 1 (G1): Ki-67 is less than 3% [13].
    • Grade 2 (G2): Ki-67 is between 3% and 20% (e.g., a Ki-67 of 5% is Grade 2) [13].
    • Grade 3 (G3): Ki-67 is over 20%. It is vital to distinguish a well-differentiated Grade 3 NET from a poorly differentiated carcinoma [13].

Pathology Completeness Checklist

A high-quality pathology report for a resected VIPoma should include all of the following [14][15]:

  • [ ] Primary tumor size (in centimeters).
  • [ ] Tumor grade (G1, G2, or G3) and Differentiation.
  • [ ] Ki-67 percentage and/or Mitotic rate.
  • [ ] Lymphovascular invasion (whether cells have entered the blood or lymph vessels).
  • [ ] Surgical margins (if the tumor was removed, whether the edges are clear of cancer).
  • [ ] Lymph node status (how many nodes were checked and how many had tumor cells).
  • [ ] pTNM stage.

Common questions in this guide

How do doctors confirm that someone has a VIPoma?
Doctors usually combine a markedly elevated VIP blood level with documented high-volume secretory diarrhea, imaging, and, when tissue is available, pathology. A low stool osmotic gap supports secretory diarrhea but does not by itself prove VIPoma, so results must be interpreted together.
Why does the way my VIP blood sample is handled matter?
VIP can break down after the blood is drawn. The sample should be chilled, separated, and frozen promptly; otherwise the result may be falsely low or unreliable. Small increases can also result from nonspecific causes or test interference, so an unexpected result may need repeat testing.
Which scans are used to find and map a VIPoma?
CT and MRI show the tumor’s location and size and check for spread to the liver; MRI may detect some small tumors or liver metastases more clearly. Ga-68 or Cu-64 DOTATATE PET/CT looks for somatostatin receptors on tumor cells and may reveal disease that standard scans miss.
What does DOTATATE uptake mean for PRRT?
DOTATATE uptake suggests that somatostatin receptors are present on the tumor cells. Receptor expression is one important factor when specialists consider PRRT, but it is not the only factor used to choose treatment.
How are VIPoma grade and Ki-67 reported?
Ki-67 and the mitotic rate measure how quickly tumor cells are dividing. A Ki-67 below 3% is grade 1, 3% to 20% is grade 2, and above 20% is grade 3; the report should also say whether the tumor is well differentiated or poorly differentiated.
What should a complete VIPoma pathology report include?
It should report the tumor size, grade, differentiation, Ki-67 or mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node findings, and pTNM stage. These details are interpreted with the blood tests and scans to describe the tumor accurately.

Get notified when new evidence is published on pancreatic vasoactive intestinal peptide producing tumor.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (15)
  1. 1

    All you need to know about VIPoma: Review on the latest studies.

    Karele EN

    Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) 2024; (53(2)):104222 doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2023.104222.

    PMID: 38109967
  2. 2

    Chronic Diarrhea Secondary to Newly Diagnosed VIPoma.

    Farina DA, Krogh KM, Boike JR

    Case reports in gastroenterology 2019; (13(1)):225-229 doi:10.1159/000494554.

    PMID: 31123451
  3. 3

    Elevated vasoactive intestinal peptide concentrations poorly predict VIPoma.

    Korleski J, Ospina Velasquez LE, Bornhorst J, et al.

    Endocrine-related cancer 2026; (33(1)).

    PMID: 41498509
  4. 4

    Frequency and Causes of False-Positive Elevated Plasma Concentrations of Fasting Gut Hormones in a Specialist Neuroendocrine Tumor Center.

    Butler OL, Mekhael MM, Ahmed A, et al.

    Frontiers in endocrinology 2020; (11()):606264 doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.606264.

    PMID: 33391185
  5. 5

    Interference With VIP to Distinguish Between Real and False VIPoma: National Study From the French Endocrine Tumors Group.

    Chevalier B, Bonnet D, Lepage C, et al.

    Journal of the Endocrine Society 2024; (8(7)):bvae102 doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae102.

    PMID: 38854908
  6. 6

    Laboratory Utilization and Analytical Validation of Fecal Electrolyte Tests.

    Parakh R, Greene DN, Mathias PC, et al.

    The journal of applied laboratory medicine 2017; (1(6)):668-677 doi:10.1373/jalm.2016.022590.

    PMID: 33379818
  7. 7

    Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

    Panda A, Itani M, Mhlanga J, et al.

    Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR 2026; (47(3-4)):149-164 doi:10.1053/j.sult.2026.06.001.

    PMID: 42264416
  8. 8

    Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

    Lee DW, Kim MK, Kim HG

    Clinical endoscopy 2017; (50(6)):537-545 doi:10.5946/ce.2017.131.

    PMID: 29207856
  9. 9

    Prospective Study of 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detecting Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Unknown Primary Sites.

    Sadowski SM, Neychev V, Millo C, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2016; (34(6)):588-96 doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0987.

    PMID: 26712231
  10. 10

    Everolimus-induced somatostatin receptor overexpression in a rectal neuroendocrine tumor patient may promote somatostatin receptor-guided radionuclide therapy (peptide receptor radiotherapy) as an additional treatment option.

    Mileva M, Wimana Z, Flamen P, Karfis I

    World journal of nuclear medicine 2021; (20(3)):316-318 doi:10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_120_20.

    PMID: 34703403
  11. 11

    Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Clinicopathological features and pathological staging.

    Lam AK, Ishida H

    Histology and histopathology 2021; (36(4)):367-382 doi:10.14670/HH-18-288.

    PMID: 33305819
  12. 12

    Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

    Rindi G, Mete O, Uccella S, et al.

    Endocrine pathology 2022; (33(1)):115-154 doi:10.1007/s12022-022-09708-2.

    PMID: 35294740
  13. 13

    Surgery in Patients with Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, Neuroendocrine Tumors G3 and High Grade Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

    Holmager P, Langer SW, Kjaer A, et al.

    Current treatment options in oncology 2022; (23(6)):806-817 doi:10.1007/s11864-022-00969-x.

    PMID: 35362798
  14. 14

    Pathologic Considerations in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

    Bellizzi AM

    Surgical oncology clinics of North America 2020; (29(2)):185-208 doi:10.1016/j.soc.2019.11.003.

    PMID: 32151355
  15. 15

    Reconsideration of Clinicopathologic Prognostic Factors in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors for Better Determination of Adverse Prognosis.

    Aysal A, Agalar C, Egeli T, et al.

    Endocrine pathology 2021; (32(4)):461-472 doi:10.1007/s12022-021-09687-w.

    PMID: 34283399

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your treating team should interpret your VIPoma tests, scans, and pathology report in the context of your individual care.