Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 17 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

What Is the Difference Between CMT Type 1 and Type 2?

At a Glance

The main difference between CMT Type 1 and Type 2 is the part of the nerve affected. CMT1 damages the nerve's protective insulation (myelin), which slows down nerve signals. CMT2 damages the nerve's inner core (axon), which weakens the signal strength reaching your muscles.

If you have been diagnosed with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease, you likely want to understand exactly what is happening in your body. The most common question patients ask is about the difference between CMT Type 1 (CMT1) and CMT Type 2 (CMT2). At its core, the difference comes down to which part of the nerve is primarily damaged [1].

To understand this, it helps to think of your nerves as electrical wires carrying signals from your brain to your muscles. A standard electrical wire has two main parts: an inner copper core that carries the electricity, and an outer plastic insulation that protects the core and helps the signal travel quickly. Your nerves are built the exact same way. The inner core is called the axon, and the outer insulation is called the myelin sheath.

CMT Type 1: Damage to the Insulation

CMT Type 1 is often called a demyelinating neuropathy [1][2]. This means the genetic mutation primarily damages the protective insulation (the myelin sheath) surrounding the nerve [3][4].

When the myelin insulation is damaged or degrades, the nerve signal is forced to travel much slower than normal [1]. If your doctor performed a nerve conduction study (NCS)—a test where mild electrical pulses are used to measure nerve function—they likely noted that your nerve conduction velocity (NCV) was significantly slowed down [2][5]. Generally, speeds below 38 meters per second in the arm nerves point toward CMT1 [6].

While the signal still reaches the muscle, the delay makes it harder for the brain to coordinate movements quickly and efficiently. Over time, the poor insulation can eventually lead to secondary damage of the inner wire (the axon) as well [7][8].

CMT Type 2: Damage to the Wire Core

CMT Type 2 is known as an axonal neuropathy [1][2]. In this type, the protective insulation is relatively healthy, but the inner wire core itself (the axon) is damaged or degenerating [9][10].

Because the insulation is mostly intact, the nerve signals that do get through travel at a normal or near-normal speed (typically above 38 meters per second) [10][6]. However, because the core wire is damaged, the strength or amount of the electrical signal that reaches the muscle is significantly reduced [10][11]. On your medical reports, this reduced signal strength is often referred to as a low amplitude [10][6].

Going back to the wire analogy, it is like trying to power a large appliance with a very thin, frayed wire; the electricity moves fast, but there simply isn’t enough power reaching the destination to do the job properly.

Quick Comparison

Feature CMT Type 1 CMT Type 2
Primary Damage Myelin Sheath (Insulation) Axon (Wire Core)
Medical Term Demyelinating Axonal
NCS Test Result Slowed Velocity (< 38 m/s) Normal Velocity, Low Amplitude
Analogy Degraded wire insulation slowing the signal Frayed wire core reducing the power

Why the Distinction Matters

While CMT1 and CMT2 affect the nerve differently, they both result in similar physical challenges, such as muscle weakness, foot drop, and sensory loss in the hands and feet. Fortunately, tools like physical therapy, targeted exercises, and orthotics (such as ankle-foot braces or AFOs) can effectively help manage these symptoms regardless of your type. The distinction between Type 1 and Type 2 is crucial for a few reasons:

  • Diagnostic clarity: Doctors use the differences in nerve conduction speeds and signal amplitude to help pinpoint exactly which genetic mutation you might have [12][5]. (Note: NCS measures these nerve signals, whereas an EMG uses small needles to look at the muscle health directly).
  • Disease progression: Both types generally progress slowly over many years, but different subtypes have different typical timelines [13][14]. For instance, CMT1A symptoms often progress consistently starting in childhood and adolescence, whereas many forms of CMT2 often do not appear or progress until adulthood [14].
  • Future treatments: Because the biological root causes are different, future targeted therapies and gene therapies will likely be specific to whether the disease is demyelinating (CMT1) or axonal (CMT2) [15][16].

In some cases, patients may have features of both slow speeds and low amplitudes, which is sometimes referred to as Intermediate CMT [6][17]. Knowing your specific type empowers you to understand your symptoms, anticipate your needs, and participate actively in discussions about your care.

Common questions in this guide

What is the main difference between CMT Type 1 and CMT Type 2?
The main difference is which part of the nerve is primarily damaged. In CMT Type 1, the protective insulation around the nerve (myelin) degrades. In CMT Type 2, the inner wire core of the nerve (axon) is damaged while the insulation remains relatively healthy.
How do doctors test if I have CMT Type 1 or Type 2?
Doctors typically use a nerve conduction study (NCS) to measure how fast and strong electrical signals travel through your nerves. Slowed nerve signal speeds point to CMT1, while normal speeds with reduced signal strength indicate CMT2.
Do CMT Type 1 and Type 2 cause different physical symptoms?
Both types result in very similar physical challenges, such as muscle weakness, foot drop, and sensory loss in the hands and feet. However, the timeline of when symptoms first appear and how quickly they progress can vary depending on your specific subtype.
Can genetic testing determine my exact CMT type?
Yes, genetic testing can identify the exact gene mutation causing your neuropathy. Knowing your exact mutation confirms whether you have a demyelinating or axonal type, which helps predict symptom progression and determines eligibility for future targeted therapies.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Based on my nerve conduction study (NCS), do my nerves show primarily demyelinating (CMT1), axonal (CMT2), or intermediate damage?
  2. 2.What was my nerve conduction velocity and amplitude, and how do those numbers compare to typical baselines?
  3. 3.Given my specific subtype, what should I expect regarding the progression of my symptoms?
  4. 4.Is genetic testing recommended for me to pinpoint the exact gene involved, and how might that impact my future care options or clinical trial eligibility?
  5. 5.Which supportive therapies (like physical therapy or AFO braces) do you recommend for someone with my pattern of nerve damage?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (17)
  1. 1

    Mechanisms and treatment strategies of demyelinating and dysmyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

    Hertzog N, Jacob C

    Neural regeneration research 2023; (18(9)):1931-1939 doi:10.4103/1673-5374.367834.

    PMID: 36926710
  2. 2

    Molecular and clinical features of inherited neuropathies due to PMP22 duplication.

    Watila MM, Balarabe SA

    Journal of the neurological sciences 2015; (355(1-2)):18-24.

    PMID: 26076881
  3. 3

    De novo PMP2 mutations in families with type 1 Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

    Motley WW, Palaima P, Yum SW, et al.

    Brain : a journal of neurology 2016; (139(Pt 6)):1649-56 doi:10.1093/brain/aww055.

    PMID: 27009151
  4. 4

    Fibulin 5, a human Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells-secreted paracrine factor, attenuates peripheral nervous system myelination defects through the Integrin-RAC1 signaling axis.

    Won SY, Kwon S, Jeong HS, et al.

    Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2020; doi:10.1002/stem.3287.

    PMID: 33107705
  5. 5

    Clinical and genetic spectra in a series of Chinese patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

    Wang R, He J, Li JJ, et al.

    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 2015; (451(Pt B)):263-70.

    PMID: 26454100
  6. 6

    Intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: an electrophysiological reappraisal and systematic review.

    Berciano J, García A, Gallardo E, et al.

    Journal of neurology 2017; (264(8)):1655-1677 doi:10.1007/s00415-017-8474-3.

    PMID: 28364294
  7. 7

    Identification of Candidate Genes Associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease by Network and Pathway Analysis.

    Zhong M, Luo Q, Ye T, et al.

    BioMed research international 2020; (2020()):1353516 doi:10.1155/2020/1353516.

    PMID: 33029488
  8. 8

    Soluble Neuregulin1 is strongly up-regulated in the rat model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A disease.

    Fornasari BE, Ronchi G, Pascal D, et al.

    Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) 2018; (243(4)):370-374 doi:10.1177/1535370218754492.

    PMID: 29350067
  9. 9

    HDAC6 inhibitors: Translating genetic and molecular insights into a therapy for axonal CMT.

    Rossaert E, Van Den Bosch L

    Brain research 2020; (1733()):146692 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146692.

    PMID: 32006555
  10. 10

    Mutations in the MORC2 gene cause axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

    Sevilla T, Lupo V, Martínez-Rubio D, et al.

    Brain : a journal of neurology 2016; (139(Pt 1)):62-72 doi:10.1093/brain/awv311.

    PMID: 26497905
  11. 11

    A Mitochondrial tRNA Mutation Causes Axonal CMT in a Large Venezuelan Family.

    Fay A, Garcia Y, Margeta M, et al.

    Annals of neurology 2020; (88(4)):830-842 doi:10.1002/ana.25854.

    PMID: 32715519
  12. 12

    Mechanisms and Treatments in Demyelinating CMT.

    Fridman V, Saporta MA

    Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics 2021; (18(4)):2236-2268 doi:10.1007/s13311-021-01145-z.

    PMID: 34750751
  13. 13

    Retrospective study of 75 children with peripheral inherited neuropathy: Genotype-phenotype correlations.

    Hoebeke C, Bonello-Palot N, Audic F, et al.

    Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie 2018; (25(8)):452-458 doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2018.09.006.

    PMID: 30340945
  14. 14

    Phenotypic Variability of Childhood Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

    Cornett KM, Menezes MP, Bray P, et al.

    JAMA neurology 2016; (73(6)):645-51 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0171.

    PMID: 27043305
  15. 15

    Novel HDAC6 Inhibitors Increase Tubulin Acetylation and Rescue Axonal Transport of Mitochondria in a Model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 2F.

    Adalbert R, Kaieda A, Antoniou C, et al.

    ACS chemical neuroscience 2020; (11(3)):258-267 doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00338.

    PMID: 31845794
  16. 16

    HDAC6 is a therapeutic target in mutant GARS-induced Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

    Benoy V, Van Helleputte L, Prior R, et al.

    Brain : a journal of neurology 2018; (141(3)):673-687 doi:10.1093/brain/awx375.

    PMID: 29415205
  17. 17

    Precision mouse models of Yars/dominant intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type C and Sptlc1/hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1.

    Hines TJ, Tadenev ALD, Lone MA, et al.

    Journal of anatomy 2022; (241(5)):1169-1185 doi:10.1111/joa.13605.

    PMID: 34875719

This page explains the differences between CMT subtypes for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult your neurologist for an accurate diagnosis and interpretation of your specific nerve tests.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease/Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.